The word 'cannibalism' dominates—the disclosure of Epstein's 3 million-page case files
The release of the 3-million-page Epstein files has revealed wave after wave of shocking cases, ranging from Lolita Island, sexual abuse of underage girls, extraction of adrenal hormones from young girls, organ trafficking, and blood transfusions, to cannibalism. Which of these has impacted you the most? For me, it’s the cannibalism."Eating People" or Literally Eating People?This "eating people" is not in quotation marks; it means exactly what it says—literally eating. Think family gatherings, men and women, old and young, feasting together heartily. Just like in Hannibal, elegantly preparing human flesh as Western cuisine and elegantly consuming it. Why is the proportion of prion diseases so high in the genetic makeup of Caucasians? Prion disease is a protein-based virus originating from consuming the brain or muscle tissue of one's own species. You could understand it this way: as long as humans don't eat human flesh, they won't be infected by this virus. The infection rate of prion disease among the Han Chinese genetic pool is less than 3%, but it can be as high as 30% among Caucasians. How many people must have been eaten to reach such a level?Why eat people? Cannibalistic tribes did it for sustenance, and in ancient China, it happened during famines as "exchanging children to eat." But what about Western cults? For them, eating people is a ritual, a yearly, quarterly, or monthly activity. This organized, ritualistic killing and cannibalism is depicted in many Western films (a special mention here for the king of bad movies, Nicolas Cage). I also want to mention an anime with echoes of Christian Biblical stories, Attack on Titan. It's regrettable that my revisit of Attack on Titan's "The Bird of Twilight" happens in this context. I never understood why King Fritz believed eating Ymir would allow him to inherit her power. It turns out Christians had long ago conducted experiments using Jesus figures themselves.So why do these Western cultists eat people? Those living in a socialist environment, like naive giants, cannot comprehend such behavior. I can only speculate that the spirit of religion in Western society has always adhered to the "dark forest" law. They have never left the jungle, always following the law of the jungle and the behavioral patterns of social beast groups. Eating people is a symbol of power, a symbol of possession, a way to acquire strength. By eating people, those in power demonstrate their authority to those below; by eating people, slave owners declare sovereignty over slaves; by eating people, the old steal the youthful vitality of the young. The development of modern medicine and science should have made people in modern society aware that eating one's own kind has all harm and no benefit, and should have played a role in combating such behavior. Yet the reality is shocking. Vicious cults have deluded their followers, who then use more efficient technology and medical means to consume their own kind. Medicine and science are indeed just tools; the user's intent determines their purpose. A knife used in surgery is a scalpel that heals the wounded, but a knife used to dismember a human body is a butcher's cleaver. We see people as people, but Western cultists see people as food. They are merely beasts in human skin.Why Hasn't American Society Revolted Yet?What is "boiling a frog in warm water"? The indoctrination in current American society is precisely that. Throw a frog into boiling water from the start, and it will jump out immediately. But start from 20°C and gradually increase the heat, and the frog will be lulled into complacency. By the time it realizes the water is too hot, its muscles can no longer muster the strength to escape. The cruel side is revealed to the public progressively, giving them time and psychological preparation to adapt. If from the beginning, the elites had publicly revealed their ugly, cannibalistic faces and the bloody truth, the sound of gunfire from an uprising would likely have long echoed across America. However, the case is being exposed bit by bit, and the public's tolerance threshold is being raised incrementally. Once mentally prepared, no impact is too great. Furthermore, in Western societies, apart from the Paris Commune uprising, which was relatively influential, perhaps only the English Peasants' Revolt led by Wat Tyler came relatively close to success. Unfortunately, both uprisings failed—the former because naive bourgeois fighters failed to accumulate enough strength and were defeated by imperialism and capitalism; the latter because proletarian fighters were careless, trusted feudal rulers, lacked a scientific struggle platform, and voluntarily relinquished the power within their grasp. Since then, there have been no truly influential uprisings in modern Western history. The dissemination of Western history also doomed earlier struggles, as their spirit could not survive against religion. So, don't be fooled by the fact that many Americans own guns. When it truly comes to a fight for survival, those guns won't be aimed at the oppressors. Instead, they'll become commodities traded for a little food or medicine—the means for bare survival. Once these are exhausted, fighting spirit vanishes completely. Is the loss of fighting spirit because guns lack killing power? No. It's because minds are not armed, lacking the guidance of a socialist struggle platform and unable to counteract the religious "ideological steel seal" stamped in their brains.
I suddenly understand why the "dark web" resources that were rampant on China's internet over a decade ago were completely "sealed" by cyber police in a very short time. This truly protected our spirits, preventing us from being corrupted by such "cult indoctrination" methods. Salute to the cyber police! If we were to accept such values and consider cannibalism normal, our society would be in great danger. Respecting human rights must first mean respecting everyone's right to life, not a cultist's right to eat people! Thanks to the revolutionary predecessors who sacrificed their lives, saving the Chinese nation from the dinner table, allowing us to stand outside the dining hall and observe this horror from a distance."They always give us signals and hints, so that when they officially announce the existence of the facts, we won't be shocked."Recently, the TV series Years of Peace aired, containing many brutal scenes from the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period, including but not limited to rape, hanging, cooking humans, and exchanging children to eat. The TV series did employ beautification and blurring techniques, yet even so, many viewers couldn't accept it and chose to report it. We are still too well-protected; seeing just a glimpse of historical truth is already unbearable. However, I always suspect that these same reporters, when watching bloody and violent scenes in American TV shows, find them津津有味 (delicious), exclaiming with delight and praising their realistic restoration. Of course, I have no evidence. I just hope they could personally visit a cultist's dining table—or even take a seat at it.What Are the Impacts of the Epstein Files Release?Finally, let's review the celebrities involved and the impacts of the Epstein case.On January 30, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice, in accordance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act (passed by Congress with high votes in November 2025 and signed by Trump), officially released the remaining investigative files from the Epstein case, totaling over 3 million pages. Combined with previously released parts, the cumulative total reaches approximately 3.5 million pages. These materials include:· A large number of emails, text messages, flight logs, itinerary records, financial transactions, handwritten notes, etc.Although the Justice Department claimed to have "completed the full disclosure work," in reality, only half of the initially collected 6 million pages deemed "directly related to the case" were disclosed. The rest remain redacted or unreleased, citing reasons such as "protecting victim privacy, minor information, and investigation confidentiality." However, many victim lawyers and members of Congress criticize this move as actually sheltering the powerful and covering up accomplices.I. Main Individuals Named or Implicated (Categorized)1. Senior Political Figures · Donald Trump: His name appears hundreds of times in the files, containing 26 new allegations. FBI internal records show: an anonymous woman reported her friend was molested by Trump at Mar-a-Lago in 1988 (aged 13–14) and was sexually assaulted by Epstein. Another complainant stated she was forced to provide sexual services to elites including Trump and Clinton at a ranch in New Mexico between 1995–2002. Flight logs confirm Trump took Epstein's "Lolita Express" private jet at least 6–8 times, often with Maxwell accompanying. Files mention Trump attended an "auction party" at Mar-a-Lago where underage girls were "inspected by touch and sold." Trump denies all allegations, calling them political smears; the White House calls them "baseless." · Bill Clinton: Listed as "John Doe 36," mentioned over 50 times in the files. Flight logs show he took Epstein's plane multiple times to Africa and elsewhere in 2002–2003. Victim testimony states Epstein personally said "Clinton likes them young." Clinton admits associating with Epstein but insists he was unaware of the crimes and claims he severed ties in the mid-2000s. Released photos show him at Epstein's residence by the pool and in a hot tub. · Prince Andrew (The Duke of York, UK): Files contain multiple photos: him crouching beside a woman lying on the floor, suggesting inappropriate contact. A 2010 email shows he invited Epstein, who had been convicted of soliciting prostitution two years prior, to visit Buckingham Palace. Victim Virginia Giuffre accused him of sexually assaulting her on the island in 2001 (Giuffre died by suicide in April 2025). The British Royal Family formally initiated procedures to strip his titles in October 2025. · Ehud Barak (Former Israeli Prime Minister): Name appears in correspondence emails; details are sparse.2. Business & Tech Tycoons · Elon Musk: Emails from 2012–2013 show he proactively asked, "Which day on the island is liveliest?" discussing a visit to the Caribbean island. Epstein replied the "gender ratio might make your female companion uncomfortable." Musk claims he "repeatedly refused to visit the island," but emails show he declined citing "too busy with work" and suggested meeting on another private island for drinks instead. No conclusive evidence proves he visited the island or participated in misconduct, but the contradiction is notable. · Bill Gates: A handwritten Epstein memo claims Gates contracted an STI after a 2013 encounter with a Russian woman and secretly asked Epstein for antibiotics. Files allege Epstein arranged secret meetings with married women for him for about six years. Due to a partnership breakdown (the Gates Foundation did not reach an agreement with JPMorgan Chase), Gates distanced himself from Epstein, who then angrily called him "treacherous." Gates' team responded that it was Epstein's retaliatory fabrication. · Richard Branson (Founder, Virgin Group): Name appears on associated lists; specific actions not detailed. · Howard Lutnick (U.S. Secretary of Commerce): In December 2012, he and his wife accepted an invitation to have lunch on Little St. James Island. Previously claimed "had no dealings with Epstein after 2005," now contradicted by emails. The Commerce Department argued "contact was limited, no misconduct." · Alan Dershowitz (Prominent Defense Lawyer): Mentioned 137 times in the earlier 900-page files, the most frequent. Served as Epstein's defense lawyer, alleged to be deeply involved. In 2022, a plaintiff withdrew the lawsuit against him citing "possible misidentification." Now retired, his influence is limited. · Stephen Bannon (Former Trump Advisor): In the months before Epstein's 2019 arrest, the two exchanged hundreds of text messages discussing politics, travel, and even planning a documentary to "rehabilitate" Epstein's image.4. Cultural & Academic Figures · Stephen Hawking (Late Physicist): Allegedly visited "Lolita Island" in 2006, but ostensibly to attend a science forum on neighboring St. Thomas Island. Died in 2018, no legal liability. · David Copperfield (Magician): Allegedly performed magic on the island and asked a girl, "You'll get paid if you recruit other girls for Epstein." Not charged with a crime, but behavior is questionable. · Michael Jackson (Late Singer): Visited Epstein's Florida mansion, but witnesses stated did not accept his services. Files ironically "clear" him of some child molestation rumors. · George H. W. Bush (Late Former President): Allegations of sexually assaulting underage males and "witnessing ritual sacrifices," but no conclusive evidence.II. Core Content & Controversial Foci· Systematic Sexual Exploitation Network: Epstein and his girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell established a transnational network, luring girls aged 13–17 with promises of "modeling contracts" and "high-paying jobs." Girls were transported to the Caribbean "Little St. James Island" (colloquially "Lolita Island") for sexual transactions with the powerful. Epstein often showed photos with celebrities, boasted about his connections, and threatened victims into compliance.· Unresolved Death Mysteries: Epstein "suicided" in a New York prison in August 2019, but missing surveillance footage and negligent guards fuel widespread suspicion of silencing. New files provide no truth about his death, instead strengthening the "powerful silencing" theory.· Selective Disclosure & Redaction Problems: Over 500 pages are completely blacked out; key conversations, names, and photos are obscured. Yet, victims' names are not sufficiently anonymized, causing secondary harm. Members of Congress can access the full version, while the public only gets a "mosaic version."· Politicization: Trump once promised "full disclosure" but after taking office delayed and redacted, criticized for "using the case to harvest votes." Democrats accuse Republicans of shielding Trump; Republicans counter that Democrats are covering for Clinton—both parties blame each other.As the victims' joint statement said:"The perpetrators hide in the shadows, while the victims are exposed—this is not transparency, this is betrayal."This disclosure resembles more a limited public opinion release than the realization of justice. The glossy civilized veneer of Western capitalism is fading; its golden age is moving towards its twilight. The exposure of the Epstein files is like burning clouds at sunset. Once these clouds burn out, the eternal night of capitalism will arrive.
